Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
aurantium_14584_contig36_p612_CTaurantium_14584_contig36_p612_CTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig36_p714_TCaurantium_14584_contig36_p714_TCgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig366_p211_TGaurantium_14584_contig366_p211_TGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig366_p414_GAaurantium_14584_contig366_p414_GAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig366_p483_CTaurantium_14584_contig366_p483_CTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig367_p736_CTaurantium_14584_contig367_p736_CTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig37_p452_TGaurantium_14584_contig37_p452_TGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig37_p648_TCaurantium_14584_contig37_p648_TCgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig371_p142_ACaurantium_14584_contig371_p142_ACgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig371_p264_T-aurantium_14584_contig371_p264_T-genetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig371_p405_TGaurantium_14584_contig371_p405_TGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig395_p164_AGaurantium_14584_contig395_p164_AGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig395_p390_ATaurantium_14584_contig395_p390_ATgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig42_p37_TCaurantium_14584_contig42_p37_TCgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig42_p371_GTaurantium_14584_contig42_p371_GTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig42_p430_TCaurantium_14584_contig42_p430_TCgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig42_p463_GAaurantium_14584_contig42_p463_GAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig430_p178_AGaurantium_14584_contig430_p178_AGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig430_p199_AGaurantium_14584_contig430_p199_AGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig430_p214_AGaurantium_14584_contig430_p214_AGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig430_p479_CGaurantium_14584_contig430_p479_CGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig430_p532_AGaurantium_14584_contig430_p532_AGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig430_p64_GAaurantium_14584_contig430_p64_GAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig430_p661_AGaurantium_14584_contig430_p661_AGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig430_p703_TGaurantium_14584_contig430_p703_TGgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746