Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadacultivar
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangorcultivar
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangebreeding_research_material
ClementineClementinebreeding_research_material
CleopatraCleopatracultivar
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1breeding_research_material
Fortune tangorFortune tangorcultivar
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarincultivar
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarincultivar
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorcultivar
MexicanMexicancultivar
Orah tangorOrah tangorcultivar
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limebreeding_research_material
PonkanPonkancultivar
Rangur limeRangur limecultivar
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarincultivar
Rough LemonRough Lemoncultivar
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarincultivar
summer orangesummer orangecultivar
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangebreeding_research_material
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumelocultivar
Tahiti limeTahiti limecultivar
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangecultivar
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
sinensis_213830_contig10194_p257_ACsinensis_213830_contig10194_p257_ACgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10484_p839_CTsinensis_213830_contig10484_p839_CTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10809_p589_TCsinensis_213830_contig10809_p589_TCgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10886_p397_G-sinensis_213830_contig10886_p397_G-genetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10903_p378_CGsinensis_213830_contig10903_p378_CGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig11033_p290_TCsinensis_213830_contig11033_p290_TCgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig11118_p335_GAsinensis_213830_contig11118_p335_GAgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig1122_p426_ACsinensis_213830_contig1122_p426_ACgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig11266_p625_CTsinensis_213830_contig11266_p625_CTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig1129_p85_C-sinensis_213830_contig1129_p85_C-genetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig11693_p301_CTsinensis_213830_contig11693_p301_CTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig11949_p316_GAsinensis_213830_contig11949_p316_GAgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig12279_p567_CTsinensis_213830_contig12279_p567_CTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig12559_p317_AGsinensis_213830_contig12559_p317_AGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig1272_p498_AGsinensis_213830_contig1272_p498_AGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig12786_p184_CAsinensis_213830_contig12786_p184_CAgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig13026_p575_GTsinensis_213830_contig13026_p575_GTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig13098_p441_ACsinensis_213830_contig13098_p441_ACgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig13112_p601_AGsinensis_213830_contig13112_p601_AGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig13119_p496_ACsinensis_213830_contig13119_p496_ACgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig1315_p884_CTsinensis_213830_contig1315_p884_CTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig13163_p848_AGsinensis_213830_contig13163_p848_AGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig13281_p942_TCsinensis_213830_contig13281_p942_TCgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig13520_p482_GTsinensis_213830_contig13520_p482_GTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig13549_p695_A-sinensis_213830_contig13549_p695_A-genetic_marker

Pages

Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746