Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
unshiu_19072_contig334_p158_GAunshiu_19072_contig334_p158_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig334_p268_GAunshiu_19072_contig334_p268_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig334_p295_CGunshiu_19072_contig334_p295_CGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig334_p310_CAunshiu_19072_contig334_p310_CAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig334_p358_TCunshiu_19072_contig334_p358_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig334_p463_TCunshiu_19072_contig334_p463_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig334_p491_CTunshiu_19072_contig334_p491_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig334_p692_ATunshiu_19072_contig334_p692_ATgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig334_p84_GCunshiu_19072_contig334_p84_GCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig334_p98_ACunshiu_19072_contig334_p98_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig355_p385_AGunshiu_19072_contig355_p385_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig357_p290_TCunshiu_19072_contig357_p290_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig380_p450_GAunshiu_19072_contig380_p450_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig380_p531_GAunshiu_19072_contig380_p531_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig380_p573_-Tunshiu_19072_contig380_p573_-Tgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig383_p110_AGunshiu_19072_contig383_p110_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig383_p219_TCunshiu_19072_contig383_p219_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig383_p339_TGunshiu_19072_contig383_p339_TGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig409_p368_TCunshiu_19072_contig409_p368_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig430_p622_GAunshiu_19072_contig430_p622_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig430_p672_GAunshiu_19072_contig430_p672_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig437_p105_TCunshiu_19072_contig437_p105_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig439_p127_GAunshiu_19072_contig439_p127_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig439_p198_CGunshiu_19072_contig439_p198_CGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig439_p574_ATunshiu_19072_contig439_p574_ATgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746