Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
clementina_122005_contig1567_p359_CTclementina_122005_contig1567_p359_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1567_p455_CTclementina_122005_contig1567_p455_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1567_p676_AGclementina_122005_contig1567_p676_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1567_p716_ACclementina_122005_contig1567_p716_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15670_p155_GTclementina_122005_contig15670_p155_GTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15678_p265_GAclementina_122005_contig15678_p265_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15678_p448_GAclementina_122005_contig15678_p448_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15678_p475_TCclementina_122005_contig15678_p475_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15678_p607_AGclementina_122005_contig15678_p607_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15678_p715_TCclementina_122005_contig15678_p715_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15679_p1250_ACclementina_122005_contig15679_p1250_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15685_p103_CTclementina_122005_contig15685_p103_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15685_p344_GAclementina_122005_contig15685_p344_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15688_p296_CTclementina_122005_contig15688_p296_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15688_p347_GAclementina_122005_contig15688_p347_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15688_p463_CAclementina_122005_contig15688_p463_CAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1569_p188_GAclementina_122005_contig1569_p188_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1569_p212_CTclementina_122005_contig1569_p212_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1569_p532_ATclementina_122005_contig1569_p532_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1569_p689_AGclementina_122005_contig1569_p689_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15691_p661_AGclementina_122005_contig15691_p661_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15691_p877_TCclementina_122005_contig15691_p877_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15707_p462_ACclementina_122005_contig15707_p462_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15719_p450_TGclementina_122005_contig15719_p450_TGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig15719_p555_AGclementina_122005_contig15719_p555_AGgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746