Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
clementina_122005_contig16283_p374_CTclementina_122005_contig16283_p374_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig16283_p451_CTclementina_122005_contig16283_p451_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig16283_p512_CTclementina_122005_contig16283_p512_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig16283_p534_CTclementina_122005_contig16283_p534_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig16283_p634_CTclementina_122005_contig16283_p634_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig16286_p253_GAclementina_122005_contig16286_p253_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig16286_p411_TCclementina_122005_contig16286_p411_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig16290_p206_TGclementina_122005_contig16290_p206_TGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig16290_p233_TCclementina_122005_contig16290_p233_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig16290_p410_ATclementina_122005_contig16290_p410_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig16290_p455_TCclementina_122005_contig16290_p455_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig16292_p524_GCclementina_122005_contig16292_p524_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig16292_p593_TGclementina_122005_contig16292_p593_TGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig163_p409_CTclementina_122005_contig163_p409_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1630_p176_TAclementina_122005_contig1630_p176_TAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1636_p333_ACclementina_122005_contig1636_p333_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1636_p411_G-clementina_122005_contig1636_p411_G-genetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1636_p505_-Cclementina_122005_contig1636_p505_-Cgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1636_p559_TGclementina_122005_contig1636_p559_TGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1637_p522_AGclementina_122005_contig1637_p522_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1637_p556_GAclementina_122005_contig1637_p556_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1637_p804_GAclementina_122005_contig1637_p804_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1640_p96_CAclementina_122005_contig1640_p96_CAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1641_p48_TGclementina_122005_contig1641_p48_TGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1646_p403_GCclementina_122005_contig1646_p403_GCgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746