Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
clementina_122005_contig2612_p486_CTclementina_122005_contig2612_p486_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2612_p522_CTclementina_122005_contig2612_p522_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2612_p545_GAclementina_122005_contig2612_p545_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2612_p783_CGclementina_122005_contig2612_p783_CGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2612_p876_TCclementina_122005_contig2612_p876_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2612_p939_ACclementina_122005_contig2612_p939_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2612_p981_ATclementina_122005_contig2612_p981_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2613_p206_CTclementina_122005_contig2613_p206_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2616_p533_GAclementina_122005_contig2616_p533_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2620_p127_ACclementina_122005_contig2620_p127_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2620_p142_CTclementina_122005_contig2620_p142_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2620_p193_GCclementina_122005_contig2620_p193_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2620_p228_AGclementina_122005_contig2620_p228_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2620_p273_AGclementina_122005_contig2620_p273_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2620_p326_GAclementina_122005_contig2620_p326_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2620_p376_TGclementina_122005_contig2620_p376_TGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2620_p392_GAclementina_122005_contig2620_p392_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2620_p493_GTclementina_122005_contig2620_p493_GTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2620_p590_AGclementina_122005_contig2620_p590_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2620_p748_TCclementina_122005_contig2620_p748_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2630_p101_GAclementina_122005_contig2630_p101_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2630_p1425_ACclementina_122005_contig2630_p1425_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2630_p1451_ACclementina_122005_contig2630_p1451_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2630_p171_GCclementina_122005_contig2630_p171_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig2630_p212_GTclementina_122005_contig2630_p212_GTgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746