Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
clementina_122005_contig10224_p605_GAclementina_122005_contig10224_p605_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10224_p683_TCclementina_122005_contig10224_p683_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10224_p702_GAclementina_122005_contig10224_p702_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10224_p834_GTclementina_122005_contig10224_p834_GTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10226_p734_GAclementina_122005_contig10226_p734_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10235_p684_ATclementina_122005_contig10235_p684_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10238_p347_CTclementina_122005_contig10238_p347_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10238_p413_TCclementina_122005_contig10238_p413_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10238_p608_GCclementina_122005_contig10238_p608_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10238_p830_CTclementina_122005_contig10238_p830_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10239_p125_GAclementina_122005_contig10239_p125_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10239_p358_ATclementina_122005_contig10239_p358_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10239_p510_GAclementina_122005_contig10239_p510_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10239_p566_-Cclementina_122005_contig10239_p566_-Cgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1024_p424_AGclementina_122005_contig1024_p424_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10240_p243_AGclementina_122005_contig10240_p243_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10241_p162_GTclementina_122005_contig10241_p162_GTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10241_p306_GAclementina_122005_contig10241_p306_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10241_p366_TCclementina_122005_contig10241_p366_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10258_p165_GCclementina_122005_contig10258_p165_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10258_p287_GCclementina_122005_contig10258_p287_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10258_p515_GAclementina_122005_contig10258_p515_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10259_p396_GAclementina_122005_contig10259_p396_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10259_p409_AGclementina_122005_contig10259_p409_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10260_p744_TCclementina_122005_contig10260_p744_TCgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746