Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
clementina_122005_contig10588_p418_CTclementina_122005_contig10588_p418_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10588_p529_GAclementina_122005_contig10588_p529_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10588_p586_CTclementina_122005_contig10588_p586_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10588_p625_CAclementina_122005_contig10588_p625_CAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10588_p665_GAclementina_122005_contig10588_p665_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10588_p701_GTclementina_122005_contig10588_p701_GTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10593_p505_ATclementina_122005_contig10593_p505_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10593_p520_AGclementina_122005_contig10593_p520_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1060_p597_TCclementina_122005_contig1060_p597_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10609_p101_TCclementina_122005_contig10609_p101_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10609_p207_TCclementina_122005_contig10609_p207_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10609_p522_TGclementina_122005_contig10609_p522_TGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10609_p558_ACclementina_122005_contig10609_p558_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10609_p86_TCclementina_122005_contig10609_p86_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1061_p261_GCclementina_122005_contig1061_p261_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10610_p185_TCclementina_122005_contig10610_p185_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10610_p264_GAclementina_122005_contig10610_p264_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10610_p413_GAclementina_122005_contig10610_p413_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10610_p489_GAclementina_122005_contig10610_p489_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10611_p92_ACclementina_122005_contig10611_p92_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10613_p124_ACclementina_122005_contig10613_p124_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10613_p208_GAclementina_122005_contig10613_p208_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10613_p372_TGclementina_122005_contig10613_p372_TGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10613_p387_CTclementina_122005_contig10613_p387_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig10613_p508_ACclementina_122005_contig10613_p508_ACgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746