Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
clementina_122005_contig9997_p554_GAclementina_122005_contig9997_p554_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig9998_p46_ATclementina_122005_contig9998_p46_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig9999_p237_GTclementina_122005_contig9999_p237_GTgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig100_p176_GCFortune_1917_contig100_p176_GCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig100_p269_GTFortune_1917_contig100_p269_GTgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig100_p282_TCFortune_1917_contig100_p282_TCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig105_p180_ATFortune_1917_contig105_p180_ATgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig105_p367_GTFortune_1917_contig105_p367_GTgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig109_p167_TCFortune_1917_contig109_p167_TCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig109_p220_TCFortune_1917_contig109_p220_TCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig126_p252_CTFortune_1917_contig126_p252_CTgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig126_p273_CAFortune_1917_contig126_p273_CAgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig128_p151_GAFortune_1917_contig128_p151_GAgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig176_p214_GAFortune_1917_contig176_p214_GAgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig191_p128_CAFortune_1917_contig191_p128_CAgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig191_p263_TCFortune_1917_contig191_p263_TCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig210_p381_GAFortune_1917_contig210_p381_GAgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig210_p439_AGFortune_1917_contig210_p439_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig211_p664_TCFortune_1917_contig211_p664_TCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig211_p986_AGFortune_1917_contig211_p986_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig215_p493_CTFortune_1917_contig215_p493_CTgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig216_p341_AGFortune_1917_contig216_p341_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig216_p621_AGFortune_1917_contig216_p621_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig61_p306_GCFortune_1917_contig61_p306_GCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig61_p324_GAFortune_1917_contig61_p324_GAgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746