Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Fortune_1917_contig66_p446_CTFortune_1917_contig66_p446_CTgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig69_p181_AGFortune_1917_contig69_p181_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig69_p296_TCFortune_1917_contig69_p296_TCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig69_p424_TCFortune_1917_contig69_p424_TCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig69_p547_TCFortune_1917_contig69_p547_TCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig70_p158_TCFortune_1917_contig70_p158_TCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig70_p248_GTFortune_1917_contig70_p248_GTgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig70_p271_AGFortune_1917_contig70_p271_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig70_p293_CTFortune_1917_contig70_p293_CTgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig70_p347_GCFortune_1917_contig70_p347_GCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig72_p161_CTFortune_1917_contig72_p161_CTgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig72_p210_GAFortune_1917_contig72_p210_GAgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig73_p171_AGFortune_1917_contig73_p171_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig73_p233_AGFortune_1917_contig73_p233_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig73_p281_CTFortune_1917_contig73_p281_CTgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig74_p267_AGFortune_1917_contig74_p267_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig74_p280_TCFortune_1917_contig74_p280_TCgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig74_p329_AGFortune_1917_contig74_p329_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig76_p185_AGFortune_1917_contig76_p185_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig76_p212_GAFortune_1917_contig76_p212_GAgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig76_p238_TGFortune_1917_contig76_p238_TGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig76_p251_AGFortune_1917_contig76_p251_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig76_p293_AGFortune_1917_contig76_p293_AGgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig76_p307_CTFortune_1917_contig76_p307_CTgenetic_marker
Fortune_1917_contig77_p153_AGFortune_1917_contig77_p153_AGgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746