Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
jambhiri_1017_contig61_p471_TCjambhiri_1017_contig61_p471_TCgenetic_marker
jambhiri_1017_contig61_p525_ATjambhiri_1017_contig61_p525_ATgenetic_marker
latifolia_8756_contig114_p305_GAlatifolia_8756_contig114_p305_GAgenetic_marker
latifolia_8756_contig114_p329_CTlatifolia_8756_contig114_p329_CTgenetic_marker
latifolia_8756_contig114_p409_TAlatifolia_8756_contig114_p409_TAgenetic_marker
latifolia_8756_contig186_p185_CTlatifolia_8756_contig186_p185_CTgenetic_marker
latifolia_8756_contig188_p423_AGlatifolia_8756_contig188_p423_AGgenetic_marker
latifolia_8756_contig188_p450_TAlatifolia_8756_contig188_p450_TAgenetic_marker
latifolia_8756_contig39_p213_GAlatifolia_8756_contig39_p213_GAgenetic_marker
latifolia_8756_contig73_p211_TClatifolia_8756_contig73_p211_TCgenetic_marker
latifolia_8756_contig73_p416_TAlatifolia_8756_contig73_p416_TAgenetic_marker
latifolia_8756_contig73_p430_ATlatifolia_8756_contig73_p430_ATgenetic_marker
limettioides_8188_contig1_p113_CGlimettioides_8188_contig1_p113_CGgenetic_marker
limettioides_8188_contig21_p379_G-limettioides_8188_contig21_p379_G-genetic_marker
limettioides_8188_contig80_p67_TClimettioides_8188_contig80_p67_TCgenetic_marker
limettioides_8188_contig99_p442_-Tlimettioides_8188_contig99_p442_-Tgenetic_marker
limon_1505_contig16_p478_GTlimon_1505_contig16_p478_GTgenetic_marker
limon_1505_contig16_p573_GClimon_1505_contig16_p573_GCgenetic_marker
limon_1505_contig7_p857_T-limon_1505_contig7_p857_T-genetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig112_p68_CGlimonia_11045_contig112_p68_CGgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig150_p312_CGlimonia_11045_contig150_p312_CGgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig150_p463_CGlimonia_11045_contig150_p463_CGgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig234_p339_CTlimonia_11045_contig234_p339_CTgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig419_p98_ATlimonia_11045_contig419_p98_ATgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig423_p329_-Climonia_11045_contig423_p329_-Cgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746