Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
limonia_11045_contig429_p100_AClimonia_11045_contig429_p100_ACgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig468_p332_TClimonia_11045_contig468_p332_TCgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig468_p368_TGlimonia_11045_contig468_p368_TGgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig468_p399_TAlimonia_11045_contig468_p399_TAgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig471_p198_GAlimonia_11045_contig471_p198_GAgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig545_p258_TClimonia_11045_contig545_p258_TCgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig545_p326_TAlimonia_11045_contig545_p326_TAgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig545_p339_ATlimonia_11045_contig545_p339_ATgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig545_p373_TClimonia_11045_contig545_p373_TCgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig614_p100_CTlimonia_11045_contig614_p100_CTgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig62_p310_CTlimonia_11045_contig62_p310_CTgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig646_p329_GAlimonia_11045_contig646_p329_GAgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig646_p430_CTlimonia_11045_contig646_p430_CTgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig646_p503_-Glimonia_11045_contig646_p503_-Ggenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig646_p522_TGlimonia_11045_contig646_p522_TGgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig648_p256_AGlimonia_11045_contig648_p256_AGgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig648_p382_CAlimonia_11045_contig648_p382_CAgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig648_p399_CTlimonia_11045_contig648_p399_CTgenetic_marker
limonia_11045_contig714_p396_AGlimonia_11045_contig714_p396_AGgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig10_p139_GAmacrophylla_1929_contig10_p139_GAgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig10_p451_GTmacrophylla_1929_contig10_p451_GTgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig101_p74_ACmacrophylla_1929_contig101_p74_ACgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig105_p105_CGmacrophylla_1929_contig105_p105_CGgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig105_p126_CTmacrophylla_1929_contig105_p126_CTgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig108_p101_AGmacrophylla_1929_contig108_p101_AGgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746