Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
macrophylla_1929_contig29_p264_TCmacrophylla_1929_contig29_p264_TCgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig29_p304_CAmacrophylla_1929_contig29_p304_CAgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig29_p45_CTmacrophylla_1929_contig29_p45_CTgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig29_p63_CAmacrophylla_1929_contig29_p63_CAgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig29_p76_CGmacrophylla_1929_contig29_p76_CGgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig29_p91_TAmacrophylla_1929_contig29_p91_TAgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig31_p101_TCmacrophylla_1929_contig31_p101_TCgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig31_p122_GTmacrophylla_1929_contig31_p122_GTgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig31_p281_CTmacrophylla_1929_contig31_p281_CTgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig31_p482_CGmacrophylla_1929_contig31_p482_CGgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig54_p110_CGmacrophylla_1929_contig54_p110_CGgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig54_p191_TCmacrophylla_1929_contig54_p191_TCgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig54_p46_CAmacrophylla_1929_contig54_p46_CAgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig54_p473_ACmacrophylla_1929_contig54_p473_ACgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig54_p644_TCmacrophylla_1929_contig54_p644_TCgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig61_p83_-Tmacrophylla_1929_contig61_p83_-Tgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig64_p294_AGmacrophylla_1929_contig64_p294_AGgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig64_p365_CGmacrophylla_1929_contig64_p365_CGgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig64_p518_ATmacrophylla_1929_contig64_p518_ATgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig79_p231_AGmacrophylla_1929_contig79_p231_AGgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig79_p372_TAmacrophylla_1929_contig79_p372_TAgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig79_p461_AGmacrophylla_1929_contig79_p461_AGgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig79_p529_CGmacrophylla_1929_contig79_p529_CGgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig79_p65_GAmacrophylla_1929_contig79_p65_GAgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig94_p185_ACmacrophylla_1929_contig94_p185_ACgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746