Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
macrophylla_1929_contig94_p422_AGmacrophylla_1929_contig94_p422_AGgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig94_p533_GAmacrophylla_1929_contig94_p533_GAgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig98_p103_GTmacrophylla_1929_contig98_p103_GTgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig98_p121_TGmacrophylla_1929_contig98_p121_TGgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig98_p208_TCmacrophylla_1929_contig98_p208_TCgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig98_p252_CTmacrophylla_1929_contig98_p252_CTgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig98_p298_ATmacrophylla_1929_contig98_p298_ATgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig98_p318_GAmacrophylla_1929_contig98_p318_GAgenetic_marker
macrophylla_1929_contig98_p44_TAmacrophylla_1929_contig98_p44_TAgenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig1_p180_TCmargarita_2924_contig1_p180_TCgenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig1_p338_AGmargarita_2924_contig1_p338_AGgenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig1_p362_TCmargarita_2924_contig1_p362_TCgenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig119_p109_-Amargarita_2924_contig119_p109_-Agenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig119_p149_ACmargarita_2924_contig119_p149_ACgenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig13_p283_-Tmargarita_2924_contig13_p283_-Tgenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig181_p135_T-margarita_2924_contig181_p135_T-genetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig195_p636_CGmargarita_2924_contig195_p636_CGgenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig195_p703_T-margarita_2924_contig195_p703_T-genetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig209_p329_CTmargarita_2924_contig209_p329_CTgenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig209_p418_-Amargarita_2924_contig209_p418_-Agenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig218_p280_TCmargarita_2924_contig218_p280_TCgenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig27_p363_AGmargarita_2924_contig27_p363_AGgenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig279_p183_TCmargarita_2924_contig279_p183_TCgenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig298_p362_AGmargarita_2924_contig298_p362_AGgenetic_marker
margarita_2924_contig301_p350_GAmargarita_2924_contig301_p350_GAgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746