Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
medica_1115_contig27_p445_CAmedica_1115_contig27_p445_CAgenetic_marker
medica_1115_contig33_p412_GAmedica_1115_contig33_p412_GAgenetic_marker
medica_1115_contig39_p508_C-medica_1115_contig39_p508_C-genetic_marker
medica_1115_contig9_p453_AGmedica_1115_contig9_p453_AGgenetic_marker
natsudaidai_202_contig1_p258_T-natsudaidai_202_contig1_p258_T-genetic_marker
natsudaidai_202_contig2_p92_AGnatsudaidai_202_contig2_p92_AGgenetic_marker
natsudaidai_202_contig6_p143_AGnatsudaidai_202_contig6_p143_AGgenetic_marker
natsudaidai_202_contig6_p246_AGnatsudaidai_202_contig6_p246_AGgenetic_marker
natsudaidai_202_contig6_p482_AGnatsudaidai_202_contig6_p482_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig104_p382_TCOrah_5823_contig104_p382_TCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig104_p448_GAOrah_5823_contig104_p448_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig104_p64_TCOrah_5823_contig104_p64_TCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig116_p256_TCOrah_5823_contig116_p256_TCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig116_p274_AGOrah_5823_contig116_p274_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig123_p658_TCOrah_5823_contig123_p658_TCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig127_p586_CTOrah_5823_contig127_p586_CTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig129_p70_-AOrah_5823_contig129_p70_-Agenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig163_p337_GAOrah_5823_contig163_p337_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig163_p415_GAOrah_5823_contig163_p415_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig168_p697_AGOrah_5823_contig168_p697_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig168_p721_TAOrah_5823_contig168_p721_TAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig172_p169_TCOrah_5823_contig172_p169_TCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig172_p241_AGOrah_5823_contig172_p241_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig172_p472_GCOrah_5823_contig172_p472_GCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig172_p508_CTOrah_5823_contig172_p508_CTgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746