Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Orah_5823_contig184_p416_-AOrah_5823_contig184_p416_-Agenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig190_p104_ATOrah_5823_contig190_p104_ATgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig190_p134_GAOrah_5823_contig190_p134_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig190_p168_GTOrah_5823_contig190_p168_GTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig20_p244_GAOrah_5823_contig20_p244_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig20_p281_AGOrah_5823_contig20_p281_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig201_p499_AGOrah_5823_contig201_p499_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig203_p623_CTOrah_5823_contig203_p623_CTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig206_p247_TCOrah_5823_contig206_p247_TCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig206_p433_AGOrah_5823_contig206_p433_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig207_p510_GTOrah_5823_contig207_p510_GTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig207_p674_AGOrah_5823_contig207_p674_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig210_p173_GTOrah_5823_contig210_p173_GTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig210_p244_TCOrah_5823_contig210_p244_TCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig210_p295_GTOrah_5823_contig210_p295_GTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig210_p382_CTOrah_5823_contig210_p382_CTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig210_p431_CAOrah_5823_contig210_p431_CAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig210_p468_GCOrah_5823_contig210_p468_GCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig210_p66_CAOrah_5823_contig210_p66_CAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig227_p370_T-Orah_5823_contig227_p370_T-genetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig25_p149_CTOrah_5823_contig25_p149_CTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig25_p456_GTOrah_5823_contig25_p456_GTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig25_p536_AGOrah_5823_contig25_p536_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig25_p562_GTOrah_5823_contig25_p562_GTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig252_p66_-AOrah_5823_contig252_p66_-Agenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746