Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Orah_5823_contig257_p242_GAOrah_5823_contig257_p242_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig257_p264_AGOrah_5823_contig257_p264_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig257_p426_TGOrah_5823_contig257_p426_TGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig257_p476_CTOrah_5823_contig257_p476_CTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig263_p898_GTOrah_5823_contig263_p898_GTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig265_p480_ATOrah_5823_contig265_p480_ATgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig269_p797_CTOrah_5823_contig269_p797_CTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig270_p420_AGOrah_5823_contig270_p420_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig293_p264_AGOrah_5823_contig293_p264_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig296_p1122_AGOrah_5823_contig296_p1122_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig296_p624_GAOrah_5823_contig296_p624_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig311_p204_CGOrah_5823_contig311_p204_CGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig311_p257_GAOrah_5823_contig311_p257_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig311_p351_GAOrah_5823_contig311_p351_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig311_p433_TCOrah_5823_contig311_p433_TCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig311_p456_CAOrah_5823_contig311_p456_CAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig311_p545_ATOrah_5823_contig311_p545_ATgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig321_p350_GAOrah_5823_contig321_p350_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig321_p636_GTOrah_5823_contig321_p636_GTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig324_p394_AGOrah_5823_contig324_p394_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig333_p97_CTOrah_5823_contig333_p97_CTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig341_p542_AGOrah_5823_contig341_p542_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig341_p683_AGOrah_5823_contig341_p683_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig341_p697_AGOrah_5823_contig341_p697_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig341_p715_CTOrah_5823_contig341_p715_CTgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746