Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Orah_5823_contig43_p439_TCOrah_5823_contig43_p439_TCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig43_p463_GTOrah_5823_contig43_p463_GTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig439_p576_CTOrah_5823_contig439_p576_CTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig439_p662_GTOrah_5823_contig439_p662_GTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig454_p560_TCOrah_5823_contig454_p560_TCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig454_p684_CAOrah_5823_contig454_p684_CAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig454_p84_A-Orah_5823_contig454_p84_A-genetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig457_p470_GAOrah_5823_contig457_p470_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig468_p60_G-Orah_5823_contig468_p60_G-genetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig474_p596_GAOrah_5823_contig474_p596_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig474_p644_CTOrah_5823_contig474_p644_CTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig477_p759_GCOrah_5823_contig477_p759_GCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig477_p858_TAOrah_5823_contig477_p858_TAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig478_p105_CTOrah_5823_contig478_p105_CTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig478_p212_GCOrah_5823_contig478_p212_GCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig507_p78_-GOrah_5823_contig507_p78_-Ggenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig515_p537_CTOrah_5823_contig515_p537_CTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig515_p624_GCOrah_5823_contig515_p624_GCgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig550_p686_GAOrah_5823_contig550_p686_GAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig560_p134_TGOrah_5823_contig560_p134_TGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig560_p199_CAOrah_5823_contig560_p199_CAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig560_p221_CTOrah_5823_contig560_p221_CTgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig560_p277_TAOrah_5823_contig560_p277_TAgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig560_p312_AGOrah_5823_contig560_p312_AGgenetic_marker
Orah_5823_contig560_p331_CAOrah_5823_contig560_p331_CAgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746