Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
paradisi_8039_contig139_p216_CAparadisi_8039_contig139_p216_CAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig140_p331_GTparadisi_8039_contig140_p331_GTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig156_p208_GTparadisi_8039_contig156_p208_GTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig156_p505_AGparadisi_8039_contig156_p505_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig158_p31_-Aparadisi_8039_contig158_p31_-Agenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig163_p144_-Tparadisi_8039_contig163_p144_-Tgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig163_p78_A-paradisi_8039_contig163_p78_A-genetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig174_p304_ATparadisi_8039_contig174_p304_ATgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig174_p88_CTparadisi_8039_contig174_p88_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig195_p264_AGparadisi_8039_contig195_p264_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig195_p85_GAparadisi_8039_contig195_p85_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig196_p188_CAparadisi_8039_contig196_p188_CAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig196_p249_CTparadisi_8039_contig196_p249_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig224_p76_-Aparadisi_8039_contig224_p76_-Agenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig244_p322_GTparadisi_8039_contig244_p322_GTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig260_p127_CGparadisi_8039_contig260_p127_CGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig260_p81_GAparadisi_8039_contig260_p81_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig265_p131_ATparadisi_8039_contig265_p131_ATgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig265_p160_TCparadisi_8039_contig265_p160_TCgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig265_p211_CTparadisi_8039_contig265_p211_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig265_p510_AGparadisi_8039_contig265_p510_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig267_p362_TGparadisi_8039_contig267_p362_TGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig268_p217_TCparadisi_8039_contig268_p217_TCgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig282_p165_AGparadisi_8039_contig282_p165_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig294_p180_GCparadisi_8039_contig294_p180_GCgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746