Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
paradisi_8039_contig294_p251_AGparadisi_8039_contig294_p251_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig294_p329_AGparadisi_8039_contig294_p329_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig294_p92_ATparadisi_8039_contig294_p92_ATgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig32_p465_T-paradisi_8039_contig32_p465_T-genetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig324_p252_TAparadisi_8039_contig324_p252_TAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig324_p273_GTparadisi_8039_contig324_p273_GTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig324_p301_AGparadisi_8039_contig324_p301_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig324_p83_CTparadisi_8039_contig324_p83_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig365_p38_GAparadisi_8039_contig365_p38_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig365_p478_AGparadisi_8039_contig365_p478_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig365_p57_CTparadisi_8039_contig365_p57_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig379_p581_-Cparadisi_8039_contig379_p581_-Cgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig379_p646_TAparadisi_8039_contig379_p646_TAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig380_p1064_GAparadisi_8039_contig380_p1064_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig380_p1123_GAparadisi_8039_contig380_p1123_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig380_p1139_TCparadisi_8039_contig380_p1139_TCgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig380_p1295_GCparadisi_8039_contig380_p1295_GCgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig380_p1550_-Tparadisi_8039_contig380_p1550_-Tgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig380_p1574_ATparadisi_8039_contig380_p1574_ATgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig380_p1635_-Aparadisi_8039_contig380_p1635_-Agenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig380_p1662_T-paradisi_8039_contig380_p1662_T-genetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig380_p1692_CTparadisi_8039_contig380_p1692_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig380_p469_AGparadisi_8039_contig380_p469_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig380_p992_AGparadisi_8039_contig380_p992_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig396_p113_ACparadisi_8039_contig396_p113_ACgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746