Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
paradisi_8039_contig763_p842_-Tparadisi_8039_contig763_p842_-Tgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig766_p1237_TGparadisi_8039_contig766_p1237_TGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig766_p803_CTparadisi_8039_contig766_p803_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig769_p270_TCparadisi_8039_contig769_p270_TCgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig772_p498_AGparadisi_8039_contig772_p498_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig772_p516_ATparadisi_8039_contig772_p516_ATgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig775_p228_TGparadisi_8039_contig775_p228_TGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig775_p246_CTparadisi_8039_contig775_p246_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig775_p501_ATparadisi_8039_contig775_p501_ATgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig78_p172_CTparadisi_8039_contig78_p172_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig791_p334_CGparadisi_8039_contig791_p334_CGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig816_p1441_CTparadisi_8039_contig816_p1441_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig824_p381_TCparadisi_8039_contig824_p381_TCgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig824_p437_GTparadisi_8039_contig824_p437_GTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig833_p362_GAparadisi_8039_contig833_p362_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig839_p224_TCparadisi_8039_contig839_p224_TCgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig839_p79_GAparadisi_8039_contig839_p79_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig844_p315_CGparadisi_8039_contig844_p315_CGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig844_p519_-Tparadisi_8039_contig844_p519_-Tgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig844_p557_ATparadisi_8039_contig844_p557_ATgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig844_p593_TGparadisi_8039_contig844_p593_TGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig844_p62_ATparadisi_8039_contig844_p62_ATgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig850_p747_CTparadisi_8039_contig850_p747_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig850_p773_GAparadisi_8039_contig850_p773_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig850_p842_CTparadisi_8039_contig850_p842_CTgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746