Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
paradisi_8039_contig850_p888_AGparadisi_8039_contig850_p888_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig853_p115_GAparadisi_8039_contig853_p115_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig853_p129_CAparadisi_8039_contig853_p129_CAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig853_p415_AGparadisi_8039_contig853_p415_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig853_p75_GAparadisi_8039_contig853_p75_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig868_p266_AGparadisi_8039_contig868_p266_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig868_p438_GTparadisi_8039_contig868_p438_GTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig880_p359_T-paradisi_8039_contig880_p359_T-genetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig889_p1021_GAparadisi_8039_contig889_p1021_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig889_p968_AGparadisi_8039_contig889_p968_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig889_p991_ACparadisi_8039_contig889_p991_ACgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig906_p296_AGparadisi_8039_contig906_p296_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig906_p371_AGparadisi_8039_contig906_p371_AGgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig906_p405_TAparadisi_8039_contig906_p405_TAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig906_p435_GTparadisi_8039_contig906_p435_GTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig906_p478_GAparadisi_8039_contig906_p478_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig906_p497_GAparadisi_8039_contig906_p497_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig952_p422_GAparadisi_8039_contig952_p422_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig952_p57_GAparadisi_8039_contig952_p57_GAgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig952_p72_GCparadisi_8039_contig952_p72_GCgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig973_p113_CTparadisi_8039_contig973_p113_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig973_p254_CTparadisi_8039_contig973_p254_CTgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig973_p323_ACparadisi_8039_contig973_p323_ACgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig973_p370_ATparadisi_8039_contig973_p370_ATgenetic_marker
paradisi_8039_contig982_p184_CTparadisi_8039_contig982_p184_CTgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746