Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Ponkan_52340_contig1542_p62_CGPonkan_52340_contig1542_p62_CGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1542_p632_CGPonkan_52340_contig1542_p632_CGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1569_p556_TCPonkan_52340_contig1569_p556_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1571_p617_-CPonkan_52340_contig1571_p617_-Cgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1578_p94_AGPonkan_52340_contig1578_p94_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1603_p852_TGPonkan_52340_contig1603_p852_TGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1603_p887_TCPonkan_52340_contig1603_p887_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1621_p300_CTPonkan_52340_contig1621_p300_CTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1621_p649_GAPonkan_52340_contig1621_p649_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1644_p800_TCPonkan_52340_contig1644_p800_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1644_p941_CGPonkan_52340_contig1644_p941_CGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1644_p976_GTPonkan_52340_contig1644_p976_GTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1649_p594_GTPonkan_52340_contig1649_p594_GTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1655_p726_ACPonkan_52340_contig1655_p726_ACgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1664_p537_ATPonkan_52340_contig1664_p537_ATgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1696_p309_TCPonkan_52340_contig1696_p309_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1714_p449_-APonkan_52340_contig1714_p449_-Agenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1739_p180_GAPonkan_52340_contig1739_p180_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1739_p418_GAPonkan_52340_contig1739_p418_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1756_p616_GTPonkan_52340_contig1756_p616_GTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1777_p183_A-Ponkan_52340_contig1777_p183_A-genetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1778_p456_TCPonkan_52340_contig1778_p456_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1778_p504_GAPonkan_52340_contig1778_p504_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1778_p546_TCPonkan_52340_contig1778_p546_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1778_p561_CTPonkan_52340_contig1778_p561_CTgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746