Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Ponkan_52340_contig179_p620_-GPonkan_52340_contig179_p620_-Ggenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig186_p544_AGPonkan_52340_contig186_p544_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig186_p742_ACPonkan_52340_contig186_p742_ACgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1860_p778_GTPonkan_52340_contig1860_p778_GTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1860_p808_AGPonkan_52340_contig1860_p808_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1876_p543_CTPonkan_52340_contig1876_p543_CTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1876_p705_AGPonkan_52340_contig1876_p705_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1894_p483_AGPonkan_52340_contig1894_p483_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1910_p218_GCPonkan_52340_contig1910_p218_GCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1910_p337_ATPonkan_52340_contig1910_p337_ATgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1937_p225_TGPonkan_52340_contig1937_p225_TGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1937_p69_CAPonkan_52340_contig1937_p69_CAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1973_p465_TCPonkan_52340_contig1973_p465_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1973_p588_CAPonkan_52340_contig1973_p588_CAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1973_p606_TCPonkan_52340_contig1973_p606_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig1973_p630_-GPonkan_52340_contig1973_p630_-Ggenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2049_p608_TAPonkan_52340_contig2049_p608_TAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2087_p352_GAPonkan_52340_contig2087_p352_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2087_p734_GAPonkan_52340_contig2087_p734_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2097_p617_GAPonkan_52340_contig2097_p617_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2126_p202_CTPonkan_52340_contig2126_p202_CTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2126_p221_AGPonkan_52340_contig2126_p221_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2126_p258_CGPonkan_52340_contig2126_p258_CGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2126_p471_AGPonkan_52340_contig2126_p471_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2126_p79_ACPonkan_52340_contig2126_p79_ACgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746