Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Ponkan_52340_contig2311_p407_ACPonkan_52340_contig2311_p407_ACgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2328_p93_AGPonkan_52340_contig2328_p93_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2338_p118_TCPonkan_52340_contig2338_p118_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2360_p631_GAPonkan_52340_contig2360_p631_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2369_p161_AGPonkan_52340_contig2369_p161_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2369_p235_CTPonkan_52340_contig2369_p235_CTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2369_p269_GAPonkan_52340_contig2369_p269_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2376_p656_CAPonkan_52340_contig2376_p656_CAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2376_p743_GTPonkan_52340_contig2376_p743_GTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2403_p819_GAPonkan_52340_contig2403_p819_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig244_p259_GAPonkan_52340_contig244_p259_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig244_p472_TCPonkan_52340_contig244_p472_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig244_p67_CGPonkan_52340_contig244_p67_CGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2469_p194_TCPonkan_52340_contig2469_p194_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2469_p404_TAPonkan_52340_contig2469_p404_TAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2492_p292_GAPonkan_52340_contig2492_p292_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2492_p436_GAPonkan_52340_contig2492_p436_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2492_p538_GCPonkan_52340_contig2492_p538_GCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2492_p557_ATPonkan_52340_contig2492_p557_ATgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2492_p709_A-Ponkan_52340_contig2492_p709_A-genetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig2496_p365_CGPonkan_52340_contig2496_p365_CGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig250_p446_AGPonkan_52340_contig250_p446_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig256_p380_CTPonkan_52340_contig256_p380_CTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig261_p519_TAPonkan_52340_contig261_p519_TAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig261_p705_CTPonkan_52340_contig261_p705_CTgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746