Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Ponkan_52340_contig701_p955_-APonkan_52340_contig701_p955_-Agenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig71_p100_TCPonkan_52340_contig71_p100_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig71_p307_TCPonkan_52340_contig71_p307_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig716_p153_TGPonkan_52340_contig716_p153_TGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig716_p457_TCPonkan_52340_contig716_p457_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig716_p652_CGPonkan_52340_contig716_p652_CGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig731_p420_GAPonkan_52340_contig731_p420_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig731_p89_AGPonkan_52340_contig731_p89_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig736_p263_GAPonkan_52340_contig736_p263_GAgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig742_p260_AGPonkan_52340_contig742_p260_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig742_p581_TCPonkan_52340_contig742_p581_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig764_p729_AGPonkan_52340_contig764_p729_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig766_p691_ATPonkan_52340_contig766_p691_ATgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig771_p200_-APonkan_52340_contig771_p200_-Agenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig771_p289_AGPonkan_52340_contig771_p289_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig771_p329_CTPonkan_52340_contig771_p329_CTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig771_p413_CTPonkan_52340_contig771_p413_CTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig771_p434_GTPonkan_52340_contig771_p434_GTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig771_p473_AGPonkan_52340_contig771_p473_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig771_p542_AGPonkan_52340_contig771_p542_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig771_p800_AGPonkan_52340_contig771_p800_AGgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig774_p265_ACPonkan_52340_contig774_p265_ACgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig774_p326_CTPonkan_52340_contig774_p326_CTgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig806_p56_TCPonkan_52340_contig806_p56_TCgenetic_marker
Ponkan_52340_contig822_p318_ACPonkan_52340_contig822_p318_ACgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746