Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
reshni_5768_contig113_p279_GAreshni_5768_contig113_p279_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig113_p376_CAreshni_5768_contig113_p376_CAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig113_p490_CTreshni_5768_contig113_p490_CTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig113_p508_CTreshni_5768_contig113_p508_CTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig169_p234_TCreshni_5768_contig169_p234_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig169_p687_ACreshni_5768_contig169_p687_ACgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig169_p703_ATreshni_5768_contig169_p703_ATgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig169_p717_A-reshni_5768_contig169_p717_A-genetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig175_p503_TCreshni_5768_contig175_p503_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig181_p272_GTreshni_5768_contig181_p272_GTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig181_p431_CAreshni_5768_contig181_p431_CAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig181_p491_TAreshni_5768_contig181_p491_TAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig203_p554_GCreshni_5768_contig203_p554_GCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig218_p582_GTreshni_5768_contig218_p582_GTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig22_p1078_TCreshni_5768_contig22_p1078_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig254_p177_AGreshni_5768_contig254_p177_AGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig263_p368_TCreshni_5768_contig263_p368_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig274_p391_CTreshni_5768_contig274_p391_CTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig283_p437_ATreshni_5768_contig283_p437_ATgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig288_p240_TCreshni_5768_contig288_p240_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig288_p293_AGreshni_5768_contig288_p293_AGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig290_p367_TGreshni_5768_contig290_p367_TGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig295_p700_A-reshni_5768_contig295_p700_A-genetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig332_p265_TGreshni_5768_contig332_p265_TGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig332_p323_TAreshni_5768_contig332_p323_TAgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746