Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
reshni_5768_contig332_p523_CTreshni_5768_contig332_p523_CTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig348_p112_GCreshni_5768_contig348_p112_GCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig348_p195_TCreshni_5768_contig348_p195_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig348_p285_TGreshni_5768_contig348_p285_TGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig348_p340_ATreshni_5768_contig348_p340_ATgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig348_p415_ATreshni_5768_contig348_p415_ATgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig353_p108_-Greshni_5768_contig353_p108_-Ggenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig367_p148_CGreshni_5768_contig367_p148_CGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig367_p522_ATreshni_5768_contig367_p522_ATgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig382_p307_GAreshni_5768_contig382_p307_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig389_p776_GCreshni_5768_contig389_p776_GCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig41_p103_GAreshni_5768_contig41_p103_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig489_p743_CAreshni_5768_contig489_p743_CAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig490_p555_-Areshni_5768_contig490_p555_-Agenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig51_p119_GAreshni_5768_contig51_p119_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig51_p451_CTreshni_5768_contig51_p451_CTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig531_p359_GAreshni_5768_contig531_p359_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig531_p657_C-reshni_5768_contig531_p657_C-genetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig55_p369_-Areshni_5768_contig55_p369_-Agenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig55_p519_GAreshni_5768_contig55_p519_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig55_p605_TCreshni_5768_contig55_p605_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig550_p588_AGreshni_5768_contig550_p588_AGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig554_p312_CTreshni_5768_contig554_p312_CTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig568_p281_GAreshni_5768_contig568_p281_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig568_p602_CTreshni_5768_contig568_p602_CTgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746