Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
reshni_5768_contig61_p466_TAreshni_5768_contig61_p466_TAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig625_p595_CTreshni_5768_contig625_p595_CTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig648_p102_A-reshni_5768_contig648_p102_A-genetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig648_p75_CAreshni_5768_contig648_p75_CAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig664_p403_CGreshni_5768_contig664_p403_CGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig664_p419_CAreshni_5768_contig664_p419_CAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig664_p531_ATreshni_5768_contig664_p531_ATgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig664_p70_GCreshni_5768_contig664_p70_GCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig683_p1085_TCreshni_5768_contig683_p1085_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig683_p662_CTreshni_5768_contig683_p662_CTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig683_p944_TCreshni_5768_contig683_p944_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig683_p977_CTreshni_5768_contig683_p977_CTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig683_p995_TCreshni_5768_contig683_p995_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig74_p507_GTreshni_5768_contig74_p507_GTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig777_p157_GAreshni_5768_contig777_p157_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig777_p640_GAreshni_5768_contig777_p640_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig815_p340_GAreshni_5768_contig815_p340_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig815_p633_CTreshni_5768_contig815_p633_CTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig883_p581_TCreshni_5768_contig883_p581_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig883_p666_GAreshni_5768_contig883_p666_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig901_p256_CAreshni_5768_contig901_p256_CAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig901_p280_A-reshni_5768_contig901_p280_A-genetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig902_p127_-Areshni_5768_contig902_p127_-Agenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig918_p165_TCreshni_5768_contig918_p165_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig918_p194_ACreshni_5768_contig918_p194_ACgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746