Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
reshni_5768_contig96_p139_GCreshni_5768_contig96_p139_GCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig96_p193_TCreshni_5768_contig96_p193_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig96_p220_AGreshni_5768_contig96_p220_AGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig96_p360_GAreshni_5768_contig96_p360_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig97_p103_TCreshni_5768_contig97_p103_TCgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig984_p341_AGreshni_5768_contig984_p341_AGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig984_p62_AGreshni_5768_contig984_p62_AGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig985_p292_AGreshni_5768_contig985_p292_AGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig989_p40_AGreshni_5768_contig989_p40_AGgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig989_p454_GAreshni_5768_contig989_p454_GAgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig989_p531_CTreshni_5768_contig989_p531_CTgenetic_marker
reshni_5768_contig991_p346_GAreshni_5768_contig991_p346_GAgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10_p667_AGsinensis_213830_contig10_p667_AGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10_p818_AGsinensis_213830_contig10_p818_AGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10012_p105_GAsinensis_213830_contig10012_p105_GAgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10012_p135_GTsinensis_213830_contig10012_p135_GTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10012_p173_GAsinensis_213830_contig10012_p173_GAgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10012_p291_GTsinensis_213830_contig10012_p291_GTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10012_p443_TCsinensis_213830_contig10012_p443_TCgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10012_p486_CTsinensis_213830_contig10012_p486_CTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10012_p561_CGsinensis_213830_contig10012_p561_CGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10012_p626_TGsinensis_213830_contig10012_p626_TGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10019_p218_TAsinensis_213830_contig10019_p218_TAgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig10019_p344_TCsinensis_213830_contig10019_p344_TCgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig1003_p558_CTsinensis_213830_contig1003_p558_CTgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746