Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
clementina_122005_contig1109_p165_CTclementina_122005_contig1109_p165_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1109_p281_AGclementina_122005_contig1109_p281_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1109_p373_GTclementina_122005_contig1109_p373_GTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1109_p392_TCclementina_122005_contig1109_p392_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1109_p458_GAclementina_122005_contig1109_p458_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1109_p550_GCclementina_122005_contig1109_p550_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1109_p602_GAclementina_122005_contig1109_p602_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1109_p703_CTclementina_122005_contig1109_p703_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1109_p742_GAclementina_122005_contig1109_p742_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1109_p904_ATclementina_122005_contig1109_p904_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1109_p92_AGclementina_122005_contig1109_p92_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11097_p255_GAclementina_122005_contig11097_p255_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11097_p406_GAclementina_122005_contig11097_p406_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11097_p563_-Gclementina_122005_contig11097_p563_-Ggenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11097_p753_TAclementina_122005_contig11097_p753_TAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11097_p872_TGclementina_122005_contig11097_p872_TGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11097_p951_TAclementina_122005_contig11097_p951_TAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11102_p448_CTclementina_122005_contig11102_p448_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11102_p517_CTclementina_122005_contig11102_p517_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11102_p599_ACclementina_122005_contig11102_p599_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11105_p288_CTclementina_122005_contig11105_p288_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11105_p420_CTclementina_122005_contig11105_p420_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11105_p501_GAclementina_122005_contig11105_p501_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11105_p728_CTclementina_122005_contig11105_p728_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11116_p148_GAclementina_122005_contig11116_p148_GAgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746