Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
clementina_122005_contig11158_p666_AGclementina_122005_contig11158_p666_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1116_p157_TCclementina_122005_contig1116_p157_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1116_p311_TCclementina_122005_contig1116_p311_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1116_p560_TCclementina_122005_contig1116_p560_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1116_p625_CTclementina_122005_contig1116_p625_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1116_p725_CAclementina_122005_contig1116_p725_CAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11161_p145_TAclementina_122005_contig11161_p145_TAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11161_p546_ATclementina_122005_contig11161_p546_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11162_p354_AGclementina_122005_contig11162_p354_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11162_p588_GTclementina_122005_contig11162_p588_GTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11168_p136_CTclementina_122005_contig11168_p136_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11168_p153_GTclementina_122005_contig11168_p153_GTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11168_p712_GTclementina_122005_contig11168_p712_GTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1117_p107_CTclementina_122005_contig1117_p107_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1117_p245_CAclementina_122005_contig1117_p245_CAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1117_p383_ATclementina_122005_contig1117_p383_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1117_p415_CTclementina_122005_contig1117_p415_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1117_p464_ATclementina_122005_contig1117_p464_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1117_p545_AGclementina_122005_contig1117_p545_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11175_p452_GCclementina_122005_contig11175_p452_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11175_p554_ATclementina_122005_contig11175_p554_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11185_p459_GCclementina_122005_contig11185_p459_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11185_p789_CTclementina_122005_contig11185_p789_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11189_p240_GAclementina_122005_contig11189_p240_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11189_p272_GAclementina_122005_contig11189_p272_GAgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746