Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
clementina_122005_contig11454_p115_CTclementina_122005_contig11454_p115_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11455_p166_ATclementina_122005_contig11455_p166_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11455_p36_TCclementina_122005_contig11455_p36_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11455_p431_CTclementina_122005_contig11455_p431_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11455_p496_A-clementina_122005_contig11455_p496_A-genetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11455_p592_GAclementina_122005_contig11455_p592_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11455_p62_ACclementina_122005_contig11455_p62_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11460_p155_CTclementina_122005_contig11460_p155_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11460_p236_CAclementina_122005_contig11460_p236_CAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11460_p437_ACclementina_122005_contig11460_p437_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11460_p701_TAclementina_122005_contig11460_p701_TAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11460_p728_TCclementina_122005_contig11460_p728_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11479_p106_AGclementina_122005_contig11479_p106_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11479_p197_TGclementina_122005_contig11479_p197_TGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11479_p450_CTclementina_122005_contig11479_p450_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11479_p783_GTclementina_122005_contig11479_p783_GTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11483_p272_CGclementina_122005_contig11483_p272_CGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11483_p357_TCclementina_122005_contig11483_p357_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11483_p483_GAclementina_122005_contig11483_p483_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11483_p513_CTclementina_122005_contig11483_p513_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11483_p555_CTclementina_122005_contig11483_p555_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11483_p618_TCclementina_122005_contig11483_p618_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11483_p759_GAclementina_122005_contig11483_p759_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1149_p196_AGclementina_122005_contig1149_p196_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig1149_p231_GAclementina_122005_contig1149_p231_GAgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746