Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
clementina_122005_contig11995_p242_TAclementina_122005_contig11995_p242_TAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11995_p38_AGclementina_122005_contig11995_p38_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11995_p72_CTclementina_122005_contig11995_p72_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11995_p738_CTclementina_122005_contig11995_p738_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11999_p747_GCclementina_122005_contig11999_p747_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig11999_p921_GAclementina_122005_contig11999_p921_GAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12_p342_TCclementina_122005_contig12_p342_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12_p47_CTclementina_122005_contig12_p47_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12_p827_ATclementina_122005_contig12_p827_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12_p943_AGclementina_122005_contig12_p943_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12002_p97_ATclementina_122005_contig12002_p97_ATgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12008_p105_ACclementina_122005_contig12008_p105_ACgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12008_p225_CTclementina_122005_contig12008_p225_CTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12008_p283_TCclementina_122005_contig12008_p283_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12008_p503_AGclementina_122005_contig12008_p503_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12009_p396_GCclementina_122005_contig12009_p396_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12011_p550_TCclementina_122005_contig12011_p550_TCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12014_p858_T-clementina_122005_contig12014_p858_T-genetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12030_p126_GTclementina_122005_contig12030_p126_GTgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12030_p217_TGclementina_122005_contig12030_p217_TGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12030_p337_CAclementina_122005_contig12030_p337_CAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12030_p449_AGclementina_122005_contig12030_p449_AGgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12030_p485_CAclementina_122005_contig12030_p485_CAgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12030_p589_GCclementina_122005_contig12030_p589_GCgenetic_marker
clementina_122005_contig12030_p629_ACclementina_122005_contig12030_p629_ACgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746