Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
sinensis_213830_contig6486_p73_A-sinensis_213830_contig6486_p73_A-genetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig649_p253_GAsinensis_213830_contig649_p253_GAgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig649_p337_AGsinensis_213830_contig649_p337_AGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig649_p445_AGsinensis_213830_contig649_p445_AGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig649_p515_CGsinensis_213830_contig649_p515_CGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig649_p537_T-sinensis_213830_contig649_p537_T-genetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6495_p230_CTsinensis_213830_contig6495_p230_CTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6496_p1034_AGsinensis_213830_contig6496_p1034_AGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6496_p1069_GAsinensis_213830_contig6496_p1069_GAgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6496_p946_TCsinensis_213830_contig6496_p946_TCgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6498_p347_ACsinensis_213830_contig6498_p347_ACgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6498_p398_AGsinensis_213830_contig6498_p398_AGgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6498_p500_TAsinensis_213830_contig6498_p500_TAgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6498_p767_TCsinensis_213830_contig6498_p767_TCgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig65_p364_-Gsinensis_213830_contig65_p364_-Ggenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig65_p63_GCsinensis_213830_contig65_p63_GCgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6500_p121_CTsinensis_213830_contig6500_p121_CTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6500_p223_TCsinensis_213830_contig6500_p223_TCgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6500_p330_GAsinensis_213830_contig6500_p330_GAgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6500_p378_TCsinensis_213830_contig6500_p378_TCgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig652_p406_GCsinensis_213830_contig652_p406_GCgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig653_p364_CTsinensis_213830_contig653_p364_CTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig653_p459_GAsinensis_213830_contig653_p459_GAgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig653_p586_CTsinensis_213830_contig653_p586_CTgenetic_marker
sinensis_213830_contig6538_p432_GTsinensis_213830_contig6538_p432_GTgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746