Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
sunki_5216_contig11_p68_CGsunki_5216_contig11_p68_CGgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig123_p66_CTsunki_5216_contig123_p66_CTgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig145_p68_GCsunki_5216_contig145_p68_GCgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig178_p433_GAsunki_5216_contig178_p433_GAgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig192_p113_GTsunki_5216_contig192_p113_GTgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig192_p218_TGsunki_5216_contig192_p218_TGgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig20_p68_ACsunki_5216_contig20_p68_ACgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig233_p238_ATsunki_5216_contig233_p238_ATgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig233_p80_GCsunki_5216_contig233_p80_GCgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig35_p405_-Tsunki_5216_contig35_p405_-Tgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig38_p380_-Tsunki_5216_contig38_p380_-Tgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig38_p68_GCsunki_5216_contig38_p68_GCgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig54_p69_CTsunki_5216_contig54_p69_CTgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig64_p299_ACsunki_5216_contig64_p299_ACgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig64_p330_-Asunki_5216_contig64_p330_-Agenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig64_p391_C-sunki_5216_contig64_p391_C-genetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig68_p301_ACsunki_5216_contig68_p301_ACgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig68_p319_TCsunki_5216_contig68_p319_TCgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig73_p97_TCsunki_5216_contig73_p97_TCgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig90_p102_CGsunki_5216_contig90_p102_CGgenetic_marker
sunki_5216_contig92_p367_TAsunki_5216_contig92_p367_TAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1001_p259_CTSwingle_7954_contig1001_p259_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1001_p323_GCSwingle_7954_contig1001_p323_GCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1001_p353_GTSwingle_7954_contig1001_p353_GTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1001_p395_GCSwingle_7954_contig1001_p395_GCgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746