Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Swingle_7954_contig145_p619_AGSwingle_7954_contig145_p619_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig145_p638_TGSwingle_7954_contig145_p638_TGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig145_p664_CTSwingle_7954_contig145_p664_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1450_p1502_C-Swingle_7954_contig1450_p1502_C-genetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1451_p243_ACSwingle_7954_contig1451_p243_ACgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1451_p271_ATSwingle_7954_contig1451_p271_ATgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1451_p621_CTSwingle_7954_contig1451_p621_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1451_p696_CGSwingle_7954_contig1451_p696_CGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1451_p759_TASwingle_7954_contig1451_p759_TAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1464_p130_TCSwingle_7954_contig1464_p130_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1464_p210_CGSwingle_7954_contig1464_p210_CGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1464_p310_TGSwingle_7954_contig1464_p310_TGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1464_p357_GASwingle_7954_contig1464_p357_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1464_p375_CTSwingle_7954_contig1464_p375_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1464_p404_AGSwingle_7954_contig1464_p404_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1464_p436_AGSwingle_7954_contig1464_p436_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1476_p642_GASwingle_7954_contig1476_p642_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1476_p708_CTSwingle_7954_contig1476_p708_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1476_p780_GASwingle_7954_contig1476_p780_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig148_p735_TCSwingle_7954_contig148_p735_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1490_p234_GASwingle_7954_contig1490_p234_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1490_p386_TCSwingle_7954_contig1490_p386_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1490_p535_ATSwingle_7954_contig1490_p535_ATgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1509_p231_CTSwingle_7954_contig1509_p231_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1509_p376_ATSwingle_7954_contig1509_p376_ATgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746