Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Swingle_7954_contig1841_p672_AGSwingle_7954_contig1841_p672_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1841_p791_AGSwingle_7954_contig1841_p791_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1841_p824_GTSwingle_7954_contig1841_p824_GTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig185_p286_GTSwingle_7954_contig185_p286_GTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig185_p495_CASwingle_7954_contig185_p495_CAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig185_p541_TGSwingle_7954_contig185_p541_TGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1850_p343_ATSwingle_7954_contig1850_p343_ATgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1850_p391_GCSwingle_7954_contig1850_p391_GCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1850_p430_AGSwingle_7954_contig1850_p430_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1850_p518_GASwingle_7954_contig1850_p518_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1850_p555_AGSwingle_7954_contig1850_p555_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1850_p645_GASwingle_7954_contig1850_p645_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1850_p663_GASwingle_7954_contig1850_p663_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1850_p764_CTSwingle_7954_contig1850_p764_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1867_p753_TCSwingle_7954_contig1867_p753_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1867_p785_TCSwingle_7954_contig1867_p785_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1867_p907_CTSwingle_7954_contig1867_p907_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1873_p178_GTSwingle_7954_contig1873_p178_GTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1873_p220_-CSwingle_7954_contig1873_p220_-Cgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1873_p299_GASwingle_7954_contig1873_p299_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1873_p347_TCSwingle_7954_contig1873_p347_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1873_p388_GASwingle_7954_contig1873_p388_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1873_p448_ACSwingle_7954_contig1873_p448_ACgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1873_p520_CTSwingle_7954_contig1873_p520_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig1873_p59_TCSwingle_7954_contig1873_p59_TCgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746