Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Swingle_7954_contig373_p746_CTSwingle_7954_contig373_p746_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig373_p91_CGSwingle_7954_contig373_p91_CGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig392_p1137_CTSwingle_7954_contig392_p1137_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig392_p1447_AGSwingle_7954_contig392_p1447_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig392_p1523_CTSwingle_7954_contig392_p1523_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig392_p798_GASwingle_7954_contig392_p798_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig396_p386_ACSwingle_7954_contig396_p386_ACgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig396_p458_TGSwingle_7954_contig396_p458_TGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig401_p329_CASwingle_7954_contig401_p329_CAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig401_p858_TCSwingle_7954_contig401_p858_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig403_p1211_GASwingle_7954_contig403_p1211_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig403_p1275_TGSwingle_7954_contig403_p1275_TGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig403_p228_ACSwingle_7954_contig403_p228_ACgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig403_p582_CTSwingle_7954_contig403_p582_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig403_p627_TCSwingle_7954_contig403_p627_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig403_p768_TCSwingle_7954_contig403_p768_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig413_p133_AGSwingle_7954_contig413_p133_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig413_p165_CTSwingle_7954_contig413_p165_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig413_p230_TASwingle_7954_contig413_p230_TAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig413_p271_AGSwingle_7954_contig413_p271_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig413_p36_ATSwingle_7954_contig413_p36_ATgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig428_p1017_TCSwingle_7954_contig428_p1017_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig428_p1032_AGSwingle_7954_contig428_p1032_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig428_p1052_TASwingle_7954_contig428_p1052_TAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig428_p720_TCSwingle_7954_contig428_p720_TCgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746