Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Swingle_7954_contig555_p234_GASwingle_7954_contig555_p234_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig555_p261_AGSwingle_7954_contig555_p261_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig555_p303_GASwingle_7954_contig555_p303_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig57_p361_GASwingle_7954_contig57_p361_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig57_p412_TASwingle_7954_contig57_p412_TAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig57_p670_CTSwingle_7954_contig57_p670_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig57_p757_GASwingle_7954_contig57_p757_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig586_p527_GASwingle_7954_contig586_p527_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig586_p722_AGSwingle_7954_contig586_p722_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig59_p25_CGSwingle_7954_contig59_p25_CGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig59_p256_ACSwingle_7954_contig59_p256_ACgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig59_p618_TCSwingle_7954_contig59_p618_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig59_p714_TASwingle_7954_contig59_p714_TAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig593_p322_TASwingle_7954_contig593_p322_TAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig593_p391_GASwingle_7954_contig593_p391_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig593_p556_AGSwingle_7954_contig593_p556_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig593_p690_GTSwingle_7954_contig593_p690_GTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig593_p724_GASwingle_7954_contig593_p724_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig593_p778_AGSwingle_7954_contig593_p778_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig593_p859_GCSwingle_7954_contig593_p859_GCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig61_p417_GCSwingle_7954_contig61_p417_GCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig631_p365_TCSwingle_7954_contig631_p365_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig631_p445_GASwingle_7954_contig631_p445_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig635_p216_TCSwingle_7954_contig635_p216_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig635_p243_TCSwingle_7954_contig635_p243_TCgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746