Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Swingle_7954_contig635_p314_AGSwingle_7954_contig635_p314_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig635_p455_TCSwingle_7954_contig635_p455_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig635_p706_GCSwingle_7954_contig635_p706_GCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig647_p1165_GASwingle_7954_contig647_p1165_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig652_p228_GASwingle_7954_contig652_p228_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig675_p100_TASwingle_7954_contig675_p100_TAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig675_p168_ACSwingle_7954_contig675_p168_ACgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig675_p286_TGSwingle_7954_contig675_p286_TGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig675_p65_AGSwingle_7954_contig675_p65_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig681_p170_ATSwingle_7954_contig681_p170_ATgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig681_p262_TCSwingle_7954_contig681_p262_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig681_p468_CTSwingle_7954_contig681_p468_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig681_p504_CGSwingle_7954_contig681_p504_CGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig681_p523_GASwingle_7954_contig681_p523_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig688_p443_CTSwingle_7954_contig688_p443_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig699_p150_TCSwingle_7954_contig699_p150_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig699_p195_ATSwingle_7954_contig699_p195_ATgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig7_p479_ACSwingle_7954_contig7_p479_ACgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig707_p1062_GTSwingle_7954_contig707_p1062_GTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig707_p1155_GCSwingle_7954_contig707_p1155_GCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig707_p1209_GASwingle_7954_contig707_p1209_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig707_p1233_TCSwingle_7954_contig707_p1233_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig707_p1278_AGSwingle_7954_contig707_p1278_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig707_p1336_AGSwingle_7954_contig707_p1336_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig707_p792_TASwingle_7954_contig707_p792_TAgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746