Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Swingle_7954_contig821_p53_AGSwingle_7954_contig821_p53_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig821_p542_AGSwingle_7954_contig821_p542_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig821_p613_TCSwingle_7954_contig821_p613_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig821_p630_CTSwingle_7954_contig821_p630_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig821_p85_AGSwingle_7954_contig821_p85_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig83_p122_GTSwingle_7954_contig83_p122_GTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig83_p164_CASwingle_7954_contig83_p164_CAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig83_p249_CTSwingle_7954_contig83_p249_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig831_p562_TCSwingle_7954_contig831_p562_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig839_p123_CTSwingle_7954_contig839_p123_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig839_p258_GASwingle_7954_contig839_p258_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig839_p308_ACSwingle_7954_contig839_p308_ACgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig839_p351_GASwingle_7954_contig839_p351_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig839_p492_CTSwingle_7954_contig839_p492_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig842_p220_CTSwingle_7954_contig842_p220_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig842_p547_TCSwingle_7954_contig842_p547_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig847_p138_TCSwingle_7954_contig847_p138_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig847_p627_TASwingle_7954_contig847_p627_TAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig85_p278_ACSwingle_7954_contig85_p278_ACgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig85_p522_TCSwingle_7954_contig85_p522_TCgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig85_p756_GASwingle_7954_contig85_p756_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig880_p607_CTSwingle_7954_contig880_p607_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig880_p625_CGSwingle_7954_contig880_p625_CGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig880_p64_GTSwingle_7954_contig880_p64_GTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig885_p520_TCSwingle_7954_contig885_p520_TCgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746