Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
Swingle_7954_contig952_p610_CTSwingle_7954_contig952_p610_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig952_p715_GASwingle_7954_contig952_p715_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig955_p492_TGSwingle_7954_contig955_p492_TGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig955_p559_AGSwingle_7954_contig955_p559_AGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig955_p753_CGSwingle_7954_contig955_p753_CGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig957_p372_TGSwingle_7954_contig957_p372_TGgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig957_p463_GASwingle_7954_contig957_p463_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig957_p562_GASwingle_7954_contig957_p562_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig957_p659_GASwingle_7954_contig957_p659_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig990_p89_-ASwingle_7954_contig990_p89_-Agenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig994_p356_GASwingle_7954_contig994_p356_GAgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig994_p38_CTSwingle_7954_contig994_p38_CTgenetic_marker
Swingle_7954_contig994_p95_TASwingle_7954_contig994_p95_TAgenetic_marker
tamurana_358_contig22_p603_AGtamurana_358_contig22_p603_AGgenetic_marker
tamurana_358_contig23_p766_GAtamurana_358_contig23_p766_GAgenetic_marker
tamurana_358_contig8_p210_TCtamurana_358_contig8_p210_TCgenetic_marker
tamurana_358_contig9_p289_AGtamurana_358_contig9_p289_AGgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig1001_p314_CAtrifloliata_62695_contig1001_p314_CAgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig1001_p437_TCtrifloliata_62695_contig1001_p437_TCgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig1008_p733_AGtrifloliata_62695_contig1008_p733_AGgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig1015_p1182_CTtrifloliata_62695_contig1015_p1182_CTgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig1015_p339_CTtrifloliata_62695_contig1015_p339_CTgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig1022_p663_CGtrifloliata_62695_contig1022_p663_CGgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig1028_p675_AGtrifloliata_62695_contig1028_p675_AGgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig1043_p967_GAtrifloliata_62695_contig1043_p967_GAgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746