Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
trifloliata_62695_contig210_p805_GAtrifloliata_62695_contig210_p805_GAgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2106_p1208_ATtrifloliata_62695_contig2106_p1208_ATgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2106_p196_CTtrifloliata_62695_contig2106_p196_CTgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2106_p310_GTtrifloliata_62695_contig2106_p310_GTgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2106_p439_GCtrifloliata_62695_contig2106_p439_GCgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2106_p692_CAtrifloliata_62695_contig2106_p692_CAgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2112_p540_ATtrifloliata_62695_contig2112_p540_ATgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2116_p656_ATtrifloliata_62695_contig2116_p656_ATgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2117_p463_C-trifloliata_62695_contig2117_p463_C-genetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2121_p26_CTtrifloliata_62695_contig2121_p26_CTgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2129_p1124_TAtrifloliata_62695_contig2129_p1124_TAgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2129_p1235_TAtrifloliata_62695_contig2129_p1235_TAgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2129_p1344_TGtrifloliata_62695_contig2129_p1344_TGgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2131_p420_-Ctrifloliata_62695_contig2131_p420_-Cgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2132_p566_CTtrifloliata_62695_contig2132_p566_CTgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2132_p579_CTtrifloliata_62695_contig2132_p579_CTgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2132_p606_ACtrifloliata_62695_contig2132_p606_ACgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2132_p749_ACtrifloliata_62695_contig2132_p749_ACgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2132_p786_CTtrifloliata_62695_contig2132_p786_CTgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2136_p568_-Ctrifloliata_62695_contig2136_p568_-Cgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2146_p109_AGtrifloliata_62695_contig2146_p109_AGgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2146_p128_TGtrifloliata_62695_contig2146_p128_TGgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2146_p566_AGtrifloliata_62695_contig2146_p566_AGgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2149_p147_GTtrifloliata_62695_contig2149_p147_GTgenetic_marker
trifloliata_62695_contig2149_p174_TCtrifloliata_62695_contig2149_p174_TCgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746