Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
unshiu_19072_contig1993_p364_ACunshiu_19072_contig1993_p364_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1993_p529_AGunshiu_19072_contig1993_p529_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1993_p577_CTunshiu_19072_contig1993_p577_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1996_p231_AGunshiu_19072_contig1996_p231_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2017_p475_AGunshiu_19072_contig2017_p475_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2017_p495_A-unshiu_19072_contig2017_p495_A-genetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2041_p422_ACunshiu_19072_contig2041_p422_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2046_p216_GAunshiu_19072_contig2046_p216_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2046_p408_AGunshiu_19072_contig2046_p408_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2046_p446_CTunshiu_19072_contig2046_p446_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2046_p460_AGunshiu_19072_contig2046_p460_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2046_p528_ACunshiu_19072_contig2046_p528_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2047_p146_GTunshiu_19072_contig2047_p146_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2047_p205_GTunshiu_19072_contig2047_p205_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2047_p304_TCunshiu_19072_contig2047_p304_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2047_p356_ATunshiu_19072_contig2047_p356_ATgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2053_p116_CAunshiu_19072_contig2053_p116_CAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2053_p138_G-unshiu_19072_contig2053_p138_G-genetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2053_p197_TCunshiu_19072_contig2053_p197_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2057_p559_TCunshiu_19072_contig2057_p559_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2072_p379_CGunshiu_19072_contig2072_p379_CGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2072_p472_GAunshiu_19072_contig2072_p472_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2072_p763_-Tunshiu_19072_contig2072_p763_-Tgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2072_p85_GAunshiu_19072_contig2072_p85_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2094_p43_TCunshiu_19072_contig2094_p43_TCgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746