Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
unshiu_19072_contig2217_p315_GAunshiu_19072_contig2217_p315_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2217_p331_AGunshiu_19072_contig2217_p331_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2217_p82_AGunshiu_19072_contig2217_p82_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2218_p1263_TCunshiu_19072_contig2218_p1263_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2223_p185_GAunshiu_19072_contig2223_p185_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2230_p130_CAunshiu_19072_contig2230_p130_CAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2248_p86_A-unshiu_19072_contig2248_p86_A-genetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2249_p261_GAunshiu_19072_contig2249_p261_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2255_p272_TCunshiu_19072_contig2255_p272_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2255_p311_CGunshiu_19072_contig2255_p311_CGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2255_p353_GTunshiu_19072_contig2255_p353_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2255_p495_GAunshiu_19072_contig2255_p495_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2261_p172_CGunshiu_19072_contig2261_p172_CGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2261_p228_GCunshiu_19072_contig2261_p228_GCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2261_p280_AGunshiu_19072_contig2261_p280_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2261_p375_TCunshiu_19072_contig2261_p375_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2261_p454_GTunshiu_19072_contig2261_p454_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2261_p471_TGunshiu_19072_contig2261_p471_TGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2270_p701_-Aunshiu_19072_contig2270_p701_-Agenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2280_p93_GAunshiu_19072_contig2280_p93_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2284_p177_C-unshiu_19072_contig2284_p177_C-genetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2306_p1112_GTunshiu_19072_contig2306_p1112_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2306_p1184_TCunshiu_19072_contig2306_p1184_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2306_p418_ATunshiu_19072_contig2306_p418_ATgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2306_p758_ATunshiu_19072_contig2306_p758_ATgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746