Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
unshiu_19072_contig2443_p430_GTunshiu_19072_contig2443_p430_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2443_p474_GCunshiu_19072_contig2443_p474_GCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2443_p550_TAunshiu_19072_contig2443_p550_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2449_p769_TAunshiu_19072_contig2449_p769_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2458_p177_CTunshiu_19072_contig2458_p177_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2458_p216_TCunshiu_19072_contig2458_p216_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2458_p260_TCunshiu_19072_contig2458_p260_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2458_p95_GAunshiu_19072_contig2458_p95_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2460_p117_TCunshiu_19072_contig2460_p117_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2474_p187_CAunshiu_19072_contig2474_p187_CAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2474_p517_GAunshiu_19072_contig2474_p517_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2479_p288_-Tunshiu_19072_contig2479_p288_-Tgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2479_p377_ACunshiu_19072_contig2479_p377_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2479_p455_TCunshiu_19072_contig2479_p455_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2487_p405_-Tunshiu_19072_contig2487_p405_-Tgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2489_p1131_TCunshiu_19072_contig2489_p1131_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2489_p1155_CTunshiu_19072_contig2489_p1155_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2489_p1449_TAunshiu_19072_contig2489_p1449_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2489_p1697_CTunshiu_19072_contig2489_p1697_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2489_p462_AGunshiu_19072_contig2489_p462_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2489_p567_CTunshiu_19072_contig2489_p567_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2489_p627_CTunshiu_19072_contig2489_p627_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2489_p660_GAunshiu_19072_contig2489_p660_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2489_p712_CTunshiu_19072_contig2489_p712_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2489_p821_GAunshiu_19072_contig2489_p821_GAgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746