Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
unshiu_19072_contig2489_p905_CTunshiu_19072_contig2489_p905_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2489_p920_CGunshiu_19072_contig2489_p920_CGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig249_p1037_CTunshiu_19072_contig249_p1037_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig249_p1272_-Tunshiu_19072_contig249_p1272_-Tgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig249_p1308_CAunshiu_19072_contig249_p1308_CAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig249_p1330_AGunshiu_19072_contig249_p1330_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2490_p884_GAunshiu_19072_contig2490_p884_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2490_p921_GCunshiu_19072_contig2490_p921_GCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2491_p379_CTunshiu_19072_contig2491_p379_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2493_p182_GAunshiu_19072_contig2493_p182_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2493_p329_CTunshiu_19072_contig2493_p329_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2494_p350_GAunshiu_19072_contig2494_p350_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2494_p611_TAunshiu_19072_contig2494_p611_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig250_p176_GTunshiu_19072_contig250_p176_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig250_p243_TCunshiu_19072_contig250_p243_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig250_p93_CTunshiu_19072_contig250_p93_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2500_p519_CTunshiu_19072_contig2500_p519_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2500_p797_CTunshiu_19072_contig2500_p797_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2504_p437_CAunshiu_19072_contig2504_p437_CAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2504_p536_GTunshiu_19072_contig2504_p536_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2504_p576_GTunshiu_19072_contig2504_p576_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2504_p596_GCunshiu_19072_contig2504_p596_GCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2504_p725_CTunshiu_19072_contig2504_p725_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2512_p820_G-unshiu_19072_contig2512_p820_G-genetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2513_p137_CAunshiu_19072_contig2513_p137_CAgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746