Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
unshiu_19072_contig2657_p784_CTunshiu_19072_contig2657_p784_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2657_p912_GAunshiu_19072_contig2657_p912_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2658_p533_A-unshiu_19072_contig2658_p533_A-genetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2661_p156_G-unshiu_19072_contig2661_p156_G-genetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2662_p262_GAunshiu_19072_contig2662_p262_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2662_p328_AGunshiu_19072_contig2662_p328_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2662_p410_-Tunshiu_19072_contig2662_p410_-Tgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2669_p119_CTunshiu_19072_contig2669_p119_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2669_p546_TAunshiu_19072_contig2669_p546_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2669_p719_CGunshiu_19072_contig2669_p719_CGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2706_p414_-Aunshiu_19072_contig2706_p414_-Agenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig272_p156_-Tunshiu_19072_contig272_p156_-Tgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2741_p407_ACunshiu_19072_contig2741_p407_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2757_p562_GCunshiu_19072_contig2757_p562_GCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig2772_p363_GTunshiu_19072_contig2772_p363_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig300_p312_CTunshiu_19072_contig300_p312_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig300_p366_AGunshiu_19072_contig300_p366_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig300_p447_CTunshiu_19072_contig300_p447_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig300_p489_AGunshiu_19072_contig300_p489_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig308_p524_ACunshiu_19072_contig308_p524_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig309_p628_TAunshiu_19072_contig309_p628_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig309_p671_CTunshiu_19072_contig309_p671_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig309_p712_TCunshiu_19072_contig309_p712_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig331_p289_ACunshiu_19072_contig331_p289_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig331_p516_CAunshiu_19072_contig331_p516_CAgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746