Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
unshiu_19072_contig439_p661_ATunshiu_19072_contig439_p661_ATgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig447_p106_TAunshiu_19072_contig447_p106_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig447_p64_ACunshiu_19072_contig447_p64_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig466_p710_A-unshiu_19072_contig466_p710_A-genetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig473_p148_GAunshiu_19072_contig473_p148_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig479_p423_CTunshiu_19072_contig479_p423_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig484_p302_ATunshiu_19072_contig484_p302_ATgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig484_p359_ACunshiu_19072_contig484_p359_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig484_p373_CAunshiu_19072_contig484_p373_CAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig484_p394_CTunshiu_19072_contig484_p394_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig504_p323_TCunshiu_19072_contig504_p323_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig504_p349_TCunshiu_19072_contig504_p349_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig505_p307_CAunshiu_19072_contig505_p307_CAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig505_p349_AGunshiu_19072_contig505_p349_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig505_p366_TGunshiu_19072_contig505_p366_TGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig532_p419_-Aunshiu_19072_contig532_p419_-Agenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig533_p607_TAunshiu_19072_contig533_p607_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig537_p1343_TCunshiu_19072_contig537_p1343_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig537_p1463_AGunshiu_19072_contig537_p1463_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig537_p1517_GAunshiu_19072_contig537_p1517_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig537_p1799_TAunshiu_19072_contig537_p1799_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig537_p1975_ACunshiu_19072_contig537_p1975_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig537_p278_ACunshiu_19072_contig537_p278_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig537_p511_ATunshiu_19072_contig537_p511_ATgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig537_p949_TCunshiu_19072_contig537_p949_TCgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746